no okay but here’s the thing about language.
it’s one thing to police spelling and grammar; it’s a douchebag thing to do, especially if you’re using it as a means of refuting an argument (“you spelled that word wrong, therefore I don’t have to listen to you!” that’s not an argument. even worse is “you used the wrong form of there/their/they’re, therefore you’re stupid, therefore you’re wrong,” which is not only an invalid argument, but ableist to boot!)—but, using “nonstandard” spelling and grammar can contribute to a loss of understanding and can bar effective communication. the reason we have a distinction between “there,” “their,” and “they’re” is to prevent ambiguous sentences! and the fact that they come from completely different roots, but, w/e.
the point is, effective communication by using “standard” spelling and grammar is cool and should be encouraged! whining about improper comma usage that, while breaking all the rules you might have learned in sixth grade, doesn’t create an ambiguous message, is not cool! and it also prevents a lot of freedom in creative writing, where breaking the rules of grammar is often required in order to convey a certain concept (see: my tendency to express a character’s thought process by use of lots of clauses with no periods, creating a rambling but still somewhat linear tone).
what I really take an issue with is people actively preventing the evolution of language—trying to stamp out neologisms, saying the use of a word that’s taken on a new definition over time is “wrong,” saying that any deviation from “standard” english (which, by the way, what? english has been evolving and changing since before it was called english. do we still write like chaucer? like shakespeare? give it a few centuries and people will have to re-transcribe and translate our english into whatever form of english they’ll use in the future, the same as we have to do with beowulf.
and that’s okay.
it’s beautiful. linguists are going to find the evolution of emoticons and hashtags and txtspk fascinating years from now. I certainly do!
TL;DR (which is a pretty cool neologism right there) LANGUAGE IS AWESOME, STOP TRYING TO PREVENT IT FROM AWESOMEING EVEN FURTHER.
THIS IS A REALLY GOOD POST.
a really good post about something other than the current shitstorm
seriously this is great and pretty much 100% my opinion
YES GOOD.
Language is not a constant unchanging thing that needs to be safeguarded, every language evolves as culture changes and that’s okay and that’s good.
this is great
i reserve the right to get angry about people using the word decimate wrong though (it means to remove one tenth)
because it’s one of my favourite pet peeves
and it makes that moment when the master says it right all the more awesome
-
this-is-ryan reblogged this from ultralaser
-
ultralaser reblogged this from choosy-moms-choose-gif
-
florentia-mitchell reblogged this from rubikovs
-
amalia-hartman reblogged this from alexandraerin
-
likeadsandstuff likes this
-
writingrhythmandretail reblogged this from literarybinge and added:
There’s also ableism in saying someone’s argument is wrong because their grammar or spelling is. People with...
-
literarybinge reblogged this from isabelthespy
-
shelfofawesome reblogged this from alexandraerin
-
null-set reblogged this from alexandraerin and added:
The problem with using “literally” as a generic intensifier is that it dilutes the power of the word to disambiguate a...
-
singularcherubim reblogged this from babbleghoul
-
singularcherubim likes this
-
believies likes this
-
neutered reblogged this from unbrokencircle
-
imathers likes this
-
svlc likes this
-
thisisendless likes this
-
cureforbedbugs likes this
-
shaunsense reblogged this from unbrokencircle and added:
Beautiful posts! I love watching language evolve.
-
shaunsense likes this
-
unbrokencircle reblogged this from brucebananeronawillgrahamcracker
-
needlesslydefiantwithtea reblogged this from megaparsecs and added:
this is great i reserve the right to get angry about people using the word decimate wrong though (it means to remove one...
-
limonene-tree likes this
-
spaceshipmatria reblogged this from isabelthespy and added:
Beautiful.
-
meserach likes this
-
ourcatastrophe likes this
-
belufronsie likes this
-
thebwordisabadword likes this
-
isabelthespy reblogged this from girlboymusic and added:
well played.
-
girlboymusic reblogged this from ironstring
-
thrublackestnight likes this
-
bildorf likes this
-
nocturnallyabuzz reblogged this from alexandraerin
-
thewatermonchichi said:
I lurve you and your language feels!
-
stupidiamaxima likes this
-
skeptic-or-true-believer likes this
-
junes-discotheque likes this
-
dreamiermaalik likes this
-
vaginasinapaperbag likes this
-
alexandraerin reblogged this from ashleyrealitymurphy and added:
First, a nitpick. Nobody uses literally to mean figuratively. They aren’t throwing the word “literally” into the...
-
ashleyrealitymurphy reblogged this from alexandraerin and added:
cannot abide some things....“literally” must...become...
-
yeegh reblogged this from gooodmorningmayamatlin
-
babbleghoul reblogged this from gooodmorningmayamatlin
-
confused--guy likes this
-
demonrevolutionary reblogged this from gooodmorningmayamatlin
-
fallingaparttocuttime posted this




